Validation of the Onychomycosis Severity Index in a Brazilian population.

Onychomycosis is the most frequent nail disorder, but unfortunately, curative treatment is still a challenge, and commonly the infection recurs. A widely disseminated system to accurately assess and classify the severity of this disease, such as the MASI score for melasma or PASI for psoriasis, is lacking in the literature. In 2011, Carney et al. established and successfully validated the Onychomycosis Severity Index (OSI), proving it to be a simple and reproducible tool. To validate the Onychomycosis Severity Index in a Brazilian population. Four experienced dermatologists were taught how to use the OSI system, and then evaluated photographs of 24 nails. There was no consultation between the dermatologists, and the results were evaluated by an impartial third party. A statistically significant (p<0.001) high degree of agreement was observed between the evaluators and overall OSI score (mild, moderate or severe) as well as its subcategories (area of involvement, proximity to the nail matrix and presence of dermatophytoma or hyperkeratosis). OSI is a very useful tool to improve the clinical assessment of onychomycosis and support clinical trial inclusion criteria (p<0.001). It also provides important prognostic data and allows for a better follow-up of treatment efficacy.

Assessment of reflectance confocal microscopy for monitoring treatment of actinic keratosis and field cancerization with daylight photodynamic therapy.

Actinic keratosis (AK) is the most common pre-malignant cutaneous lesion of the skin, often associated with field cancerization. Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) is used as treatment, showing good histological results. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) may be useful as a non-invasive, real-time approach to monitor treatment, however, there is a lack of data on the correlation between RCM and histopathological findings in AK patients treated with DL-PDT. To correlate histological and RCM findings and evaluate the efficacy of DL-PDT in patients with AK and field cancerization treated with DL-PDT. Patients with field cancerization and a minimum of six AK lesions on the face were included in the study. A single session combining methyl aminolevulinate followed by two-hour daylight exposure of the face was performed. RCM and biopsy were performed before and after three months of the intervention to compare efficacy between patients using the Wilcoxon test, and concordance of the findings based on the different methods was analysed using the Kappa test. Twenty-four patients completed the study. An improvement in photodamage and a decrease in the number of AK lesions (45.3% reduction) was observed. Regression in atypia and dysplasia was observed via histopathology and RCM, however, there was poor agreement between the methods. No changes were observed after treatment for inflammation, fibroplasia and acantholysis. Concordance between histological and RCM findings was poor, suggesting that RCM cannot replace the histopathological examination, however, it may be used as an adjuvant test for follow-up of patients. Despite this, DL-PDT proved to be an effective method for treating AK.

A 12-month follow-up split-scalp study comparing calcipotriol-assisted MAL-PDT with conventional MAL-PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a randomized controlled trial.

To enhance the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for actinic keratosis (AKs), physical and chemical pre-treatments, such as calcipotriol (CAL) have been suggested. To compare the long-term 12-month efficacy and safety between methylaminolevulinate (MAL)-PDT and prior application of topical CAL versus conventional MAL-PDT for AKs of the scalp. Twenty patients with multiple AKs on the scalp were randomized to receive conventional PDT on one side of the scalp and CAL-assisted PDT, in which CAL was applied daily for 15 days beforehand, on the other side. Patients were evaluated for AK clearance at three, six and 12 months thereafter. All 20 patients completed the study. At three months, overall AK clearance was 92.07% and 82.04% for CAL-PDT and conventional PDT, respectively (p < 0.001). Similar results were found at six and 12 months: 92.07% and 81.69% (p < 0.001), and 90.69% and 77.46% (p < 0.001) for CAL-PDT and conventional PDT, respectively. Grade I AKs showed a similar response rate for both sides (p = 0.055) at three months and significant differences were obtained at six (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p < 0.001) for CAL-PDT and conventional PDT. Grade II AKs showed greater improvement on the CAL-PDT side (89.55% vs 62.90%) (p < 0.001) at three months. No difference was found at six and 12 months. CAL-PDT proved to be safe and more effective than conventional PDT for the treatment of AKs on the scalp after 12 months. CAL pre-treatment may have enhanced the efficacy of PDT for AK treatment, however, larger trials are needed to corroborate our findings.

Structured Expert Consensus on Actinic Keratosis: Treatment Algorithm Focusing on Daylight PDT.

BACKGROUND: A practical and up-to-date consensus among experts is paramount to further improve patient care in actinic keratosis (AK). OBJECTIVES: To develop a structured consensus statement on the diagnosis, classification, and practical management of AK based on up-to-date information. METHODS: A systematic review of AK clinical guidelines was conducted. This informed the preparation of a 3-round Delphi procedure followed by a consensus meeting, which combined the opinions of 16 clinical experts from 13 countries, to construct a structured consensus statement and a treatment algorithm positioning daylight photodynamic therapy (dl-PDT) among other AK treatment options. RESULTS: The systematic review found deficiencies in current guidelines with respect to new AK treatments such as ingenol mebutate and dl-PDT. The Delphi panel established consensus statements across definition, diagnosis, classification, and management of AK. While the diagnosis of AK essentially rests on the nature of lesions, treatment decisions are based on several clinical and nonclinical patient factors and diverse environmental attributes. Participants agreed on ranked treatment preferences for the management of AK and on classifying AK in 3 clinical situations: isolated AK lesions requiring lesion-directed treatment, multiple lesions within a small field, and multiple lesions within a large field, both requiring specific treatment approaches. Different AK treatment options were discussed for each clinical situation. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide practical recommendations for the treatment of AK, which are readily transferable to clinical practice, and incorporate the physician's clinical judgement. The structured consensus statement positioned dl-PDT as a valuable option for patients with multiple AKs in small or large fields.

Evaluation of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic cheilitis.

INTRODUCTION: Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a lip intraepithelial neoplasia, whose cells present alterations similar to those presented by invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). OBJECTIVE: To conduct clinical and laboratory evaluation by histopathology and immunohistochemistry of the efficacy of actinic cheilitis treatment using photodynamic therapy (PDT) with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) and noncoherent red light. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with actinic cheilitis detected by histopathological examination were submitted to two sessions of photodynamic therapy with a two-week interval between them. They were examined immediately after the sessions, four, six, and twelve weeks after beginning treatment when a new biopsy was carried out. Clinical histopathological and immunohistochemical parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients who underwent biopsy, 16 completed two photodynamic therapy sessions and the material of one patient was insufficient for immunohistochemistry. Complete clinical response was achieved in 62.5% (10 of 16 patients) and 37.5% still remained with clinical evidence of AC. In spite of this, no case of cure by histopathological analysis was found. There was no significant statistical change among the values of Ki-67, survivin, and p53 observed before and after treatment. CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy, as carried out in this trial, was not an efficacious therapeutic option for treating patients with actinic cheilitis included in this sample.

Feasibility of daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis throughout the year in Central and South America: a meteorological study.

BACKGROUND: Daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) is an efficacious treatment option for thin actinic keratosis (AK) that offers advantages over conventional PDT in terms of tolerability, treatment duration, and cost. A clinical study conducted in Australia determined the mean irradiance during a 2-hour exposure to be 305.8 W/m(2) (range: 40-585 W/m(2) ). The protoporphyrin IX light dose is influenced by latitude, weather conditions, and time of year. A recent study of meteorological data concluded that DL-PDT can be performed effectively throughout the year in Australia. OBJECTIVES: Based on the same hypothesis and applying the same methodology, the present study investigated the suitability of daylight to perform DL-PDT in Central and South America. METHODS: Solar radiation and weather data were gathered and analyzed to assess daylight irradiance (light intensity) throughout a full year across 32 geographical locations in Central and South America. RESULTS: The minimum average daily solar irradiance reported was above 305.8 W/m(2) in all locations investigated throughout the year. Annual averages of daily irradiance ranged from 578 W/m(2) in Chihuahua, Mexico, to 321 W/m(2) in Puerto Montt, Chile. CONCLUSIONS: Daylight-mediated PDT for AK can be performed effectively throughout the year in Central and South America given that weather conditions permit a comfortable 2-hour direct exposure to daylight.

Clinical and Histopathologic Assessment of Facial Melasma After Low-Fluence Q-Switched Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet Laser.

BACKGROUND: Melasma is a frequent and difficult to treat skin disorder. Results of laser therapy are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of low-fluence Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (QS Nd:YAG) laser for melasma treatment and assess recurrence rates and histopathologic findings before and after treatment. METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with 10 weekly sessions of low-fluence 1064-nm QS Nd:YAG laser at 1-week intervals. The modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score was evaluated at baseline; 1 week; and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Epidermal melanin quantification was performed on 10 biopsy samples and compared before and after treatment. RESULTS: All patients showed improvement by mMASI scores, range (21%-75%) compared with that at baseline. No permanent side effects occurred. The recurrence rate was 81%. By histopathology, a slight, nonsignificant (p = .305) decrease in melanin deposition was seen in all layers of the epidermis 1 week after the laser treatments ended. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the safety and effectiveness of low-fluence QS Nd:YAG laser for treating melasma; however, the high recurrence suggests poor long-term results when the laser is used as a monotherapy.

Daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy for actinic damage in Latin America: consensus recommendations.

Although conventional photodynamic therapy (c-PDT) using methyl aminolevulinate cream (MAL) is effective for the treatment of grade I-II facial and scalp actinic keratosis (AK), it is associated with treatment-related pain for some patients. Daylight-mediated PDT (DL-PDT) has shown similar efficacy to c-PDT, was nearly painless, and was well tolerated. Overall, DL-PDT effectively treats AK and offers a simpler and better tolerated treatment option than c-PDT. This consensus panel provided recommendations on the use of DL-PDT in Latin America (LATAM) for the treatment of actinic damage associated with few or multiple AKs. The panel was comprised of eight dermatologists from different LATAM countries who have experience using PDT for the treatment of actinic damage. The panel reviewed the relevant literature and provided personal expertise with regard to using DL-PDT for the treatment of photodamage with or without AK. The recommendations formulated by the expert panel provide evidence-based guidelines on all aspects of DL-PDT for the treatment of actinic damage associated with AK in different regions of LATAM. These recommendations provide guidance for dermatologists to ensure maintenance of efficacy and safety of DL-PDT when treating actinic damage, associated with few or multiple AKs in sun-exposed skin.

Cutaneous field cancerization: clinical, histopathological and therapeutic aspects.

The concept of "field cancerization" was first introduced by Slaughter in 1953 when studying the presence of histologically abnormal tissue surrounding oral squamous cell carcinoma. It was proposed to explain the development of multiple primary tumors and locally recurrent cancer. Organ systems in which field cancerization has been described since then are: head and neck (oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx), lung, vulva, esophagus, cervix, breast, skin, colon, and bladder. Recent molecular studies support the carcinogenesis model in which the development of a field with genetically altered cells plays a central role. An important clinical implication is that fields often remain after the surgery for the primary tumor and may lead to new cancers, designated presently as "a second primary tumor" or "local recurrence," depending on the exact site and time interval. In conclusion, the development of an expanding pre-neoplastic field appears to be a critical step in epithelial carcinogenesis with important clinical consequences. Diagnosis and treatment of epithelial cancers should not only be focused on the tumor but also on the field from which it developed. The most important etiopathogenetic, clinical, histopathological and therapeutic aspects of field cancerization are reviewed in this article.

Cutaneous field cancerization: clinical, histopathological and therapeutic aspects / Campo de cancerizacao cutaneo: implicacoes clinicas, histopatologicas e terapeuticas

The concept of "field cancerization" was first introduced by Slaughter in 1953 when studying the presence of histologically abnormal tissue surrounding oral squamous cell carcinoma. It was proposed to explain the development of multiple primary tumors and locally recurrent cancer. Organ systems in which field cancerization has been described since then are: head and neck (oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx), lung, vulva, esophagus, cervix, breast, skin, colon, and bladder. Recent molecular studies support the carcinogenesis model in which the development of a field with genetically altered cells plays a central role. An important clinical implication is that fields often remain after the surgery for the primary tumor and may lead to new cancers, designated presently as "a second primary tumor" or "local recurrence," depending on the exact site and time interval. In conclusion, the development of an expanding pre-neoplastic field appears to be a critical step in epithelial carcinogenesis with important clinical consequences. Diagnosis and treatment of epithelial cancers should not only be focused on the tumor but also on the field from which it developed. The most important etiopathogenetic, clinical, histopathological and therapeutic aspects of field cancerization are reviewed in this article.

O conceito de campo de cancerização foi empregado, pela primeira vez, por Slaughter em 1953, estudando o tecido alterado peri-tumoral de carcinoma espinocelular, através da histopatologia. O conceito foi proposto para explicar o desenvolvimento de múltiplos tumores primários e recorrentes na mesma área onde já havia alterações histopatológicas. Os órgãos que apresentam campo de cancerização, até hoje descritos são: cavidade oral, orofaringe, pulmão, vulva, esôfago, cérvix uterino, pele, mama, cólon e bexiga. Os resultados obtidos a partir da biologia molecular sustentam o modelo de carcinogênese, onde um campo com células geneticamente alteradas têm papel fundamental. Uma importante implicação clínica é o fato de que campos com células mutadas geralmente permanecem após a cirurgia para a remoção de um tumor primário, podendo originar novos tumores, designados como segundo tumor primário ou recorrência local, dependendo do local exato e do intervalo entre a cirurgia e a detecção deste novo tumor. O desenvolvimento de campos com células mutadas é considerado uma etapa crítica na carcinogênese, com importante repercussão clínica. Assim, o diagnóstico e tratamento das lesões malignas epiteliais deve abordar não somente o tumor isolado mas sim, todo o campo onde se desenvolveu. Neste artigo, revisamos aspectos importantes da etiopatogenia, clínica, histopatologia e da terapêutica do campo de cancerização.

A pilot split-face study comparing conventional methyl aminolevulinate-photodynamic therapy (PDT) with microneedling-assisted PDT on actinically damaged skin.

BACKGROUND: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an approved treatment for superficial nonmelanoma skin cancers. To enhance photosensitizer penetration into the epidermis, microneedling (MN) devices or ablative carbon dioxide lasers are combined with PDT. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of MN-assisted PDT with that of conventional PDT in human skin field cancerization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with multiple actinic keratoses (AKs) and photodamage were randomized to receive conventional methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) with previous gentle curettage on one side of the face and MAL-PDT combined with 1.5-mm-length MN on the other side after MAL application. After a 90-minute incubation, patients were illuminated with a red light-emitting diode and evaluated for improvement of photodamage, clearance of AKs, and side effects before and after 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: At day 30, global scores for photodamage, mottled pigmentation, roughness, and sallowness improved on both sides (p < .05), but fine lines improved only on the MN-PDT side (p = .004). At day 90, facial erythema (p = .04) and coarse wrinkles (p = .002) also improved on the MN-PDT side, in addition to fine lines for conventional MAL-PDT (p = .01). Erythema (p = .009), edema (p = .01), crusting (p = .01), and pain (p = .004) were more common and intense on the MN-PDT side. One patient developed a secondary bacterial infection at day 7 on the MN-PDT side. Average AK clearance was 88.3%, with no difference between the sides. CONCLUSION: Microneedling-assisted PDT is a safe and effective method and can produce superior cosmetic results to conventional MAL-PDT for improving photodamaged skin. Further larger prospective studies are needed to determine whether the addition of MN decreases actinic keratosis.

Pain in photodynamic therapy: mechanism of action and management strategies.

Photodynamic therapy involves administration of a photosensitizing drug and its subsequent activation by irradiation with a light source at wavelengths matching the absorption spectrum of the photosensitizer. In many countries around the world, topical photodynamic therapy has been approved for treatment of cutaneous oncologic conditions such as actinic keratosis, Bowen's disease, and superficial basal cell carcinoma. Multicenter, randomized, controlled studies have confirmed its efficacy and superior cosmetic outcomes compared to conventional therapies. Nevertheless, this therapeutic method presents some adverse effects, such as erythema, edema, pigmentation, pustules, and pain. There is no doubt that pain is the most severe of the adverse effects, being sometimes responsible for definitive treatment interruption. The pain mechanism has not yet been fully understood, which makes complete pain control a challenge to be conquered. In spite of that, this literature review presents some useful pain management strategies as well as the most important pain-related factors in photodynamic therapy.

Pain in photodynamic therapy: mechanism of action and management strategies / Dor na terapia fotodinâmica: mecanismo de ação e estratégias de manejo

Photodynamic therapy involves administration of a photosensitizing drug and its subsequent activation by irradiation with a light source at wavelengths matching the absorption spectrum of the photosensitizer. In many countries around the world, topical photodynamic therapy has been approved for treatment of cutaneous oncologic conditions such as actinic keratosis, Bowen's disease, and superficial basal cell carcinoma. Multicenter, randomized, controlled studies have confirmed its efficacy and superior cosmetic outcomes compared to conventional therapies. Nevertheless, this therapeutic method presents some adverse effects, such as erythema, edema, pigmentation, pustules, and pain. There is no doubt that pain is the most severe of the adverse effects, being sometimes responsible for definitive treatment interruption. The pain mechanism has not yet been fully understood, which makes complete pain control a challenge to be conquered. In spite of that, this literature review presents some useful pain management strategies as well as the most important pain-related factors in photodynamic therapy.

A terapia fotodinâmica consiste na administração de uma droga fotossensibilizante e sua subseqüente irradiação com uma fonte de luz de espectro correspondente ao do seu fotossensibilizador. Em diversos países do mundo, a terapia fotodinâmica tópica é aprovada para o tratamento de condições oncológicas cutâneas como queratoses actínicas, doença de Bowen e carcinoma basocelular superficial. Estudos multicêntricos controlados e randomizados confirmam sua eficácia e seus resultados cosméticos superiores em relação às terapias convencionais. No entanto, existem alguns efeitos adversos inerentes a esse método terapêutico, como eritema, edema, pigmentação, pústulas e dor. Essa última é, sem dúvida, a mais importante deles, chegando a ser responsável pela interrupção definitiva do tratamento em alguns casos. O mecanismo dessa dor permanece ainda não completamente entendido. Tal fato faz do controle total da dor durante a terapia fotodinâmica um desafio ainda a ser conquistado. Apesar disso, esta revisão apresenta algumas estratégias que podem ajudar os pacientes a tolerar melhor a terapia fotodinâmica, além de relacionar os principais fatores ligados à dor descritos na literatura.

Estudo da pele do campo cancerizável antes e após a terapia fotodinâmica através dos métodos clínicos, histopatológicos e imunohistoquímicos / Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical assessment of human skin field cancerization before and after photodynamic therapy

O conceito de campo de cancerização, em dermatologia, sugere que a pele fotodanificada tem maior potencial para o desenvolvimento de neoplasias cutâneas. A terapia fotodinâmica (TFD) é um método não invasivo para o tratamento de queratoses actínicas (QA) múltiplas, possibilitando a abordagem de todo o campo. Vinte e seis pacientes com múltiplas QAs na face foram submetidos a três sessões de TFD com metilaminolevulinato 16% (MAL) e luz vermelha, com intervalo de um mês. Biópsias foram realizadas antes e após três meses da última sessão e o material corado para hematoxilina-eosina e Weigert. O estudo imunohistoquímico foi feito para os marcadores: TP-53, pró-colageno I, Metaloproteinase-1 e Tenascina-C. A avaliação do fotoenvelhecimento global melhorou consideravelmente (p < 0,001) e a cura clínica das QAs foi de 89,5% ao final do estudo. Duas sessões mostraram ser equivalentes a três sessões de TFD. Diminuição significante do grau e extensão da atipia celular (p < 0,001), aumento das fibras colágenas (p = 0,001) e melhora do grau de elastose (p = 0,002) foram observadas. O estudo imunohistoquímico mostrou diminuição da expressão da TP-53 (p = 0,580), aumento de pró-colágeno I (p = 0,477) e de MMP-1 (p = 0,08), embora não houvesse diferença estatisticamente significante. Aumento significativo foi observado para Tenascina-C (p = 0,024). Múltiplas sessões de TFD com MAL induziram melhora clínica e histológica do campo de cancerização. A diminuição da severidade e extensão da atipia celular associada à menor expressão de TP-53 sugerem redução do potencial carcinogênico do campo.

The field cancerization concept suggests that photodamaged skin has an increased risk for the development of malignant lesions. Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a non-invasive therapeutic method for multiple actinic keratosis (AK), allowing the possibility of treating the entire surface. Twenty-six patients with photodamaged skin and multiple AKs on the face were submitted to three consecutive sessions of PDT with mehtylaminolevulinate 16% (MAL) and red light, one month apart. Biopsies were performed before and three months after the last treatment session, and stained for hematoxilin-eosin and Weigert. Immunohistochemestry study was performed for TP-53, pro-collagen I, Metalloproteinase-1 and Tenascin-C. The global score for photodamage improved considerably in all patients (p < 0.001). The AK clearance rate was 89.5% at the end of the study. Two treatments were similar to three MAL-PDT sessions. A significant decrease in keratinocytes atypia grade and amount was observed (p < 0.001). A significant increase in collagen deposition (p = 0.001) and improvement of solar elastosis (p = 0.002) were noticed. Immunohistochemical study showed decreased TP-53 expression although not statistically significant (p = 0.580), increased pro-collagen I and MMP-1 expressions (p = 0.477 and p = 0.08) again not statistically significant and a increased expression of Tenascin-C (p = 0.024), which was statistically significant. In conclusion, multiple sessions of MAL-PDT induced clinical and histological improvement of field cancerization. The decrease in severity and extension of keratinocytes atypia associated with a decreased expression of TP-53 suggest a reduced carcinogenic potential of the altered field.